Wednesday, March 31, 2010

This Is in Contention for the Worst Thing Ever Written

Academics don't know what they're writing about.

Total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the exterior absolute the absolute existent (of that of which it is not possible to univocally predicate an outside, while the equivocal predication of the outside of the absolute exterior is possible of that of which the reality so predicated is not the reality, viz., of the dark/of the self, the identity of which is not outside the absolute identity of the outside, which is to say that the equivocal predication of identity is possible of the self-identity which is not identity, while identity is univocally predicated of the limit to the darkness, of the limit of the reality of the self). This is the real exteriority of the absolute outside: the reality of the absolutely unconditioned absolute outside univocally predicated of the dark: the light univocally predicated of the darkness: the shining of the light univocally predicated of the limit of the darkness: actuality univocally predicated of the other of self-identity: existence univocally predicated of the absolutely unconditioned other of the self. The precision of the shining of the light breaking the dark is the other-identity of the light. The precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in “self-alienation,” not “self-identity, itself in self-alienation” “released” in and by “otherness,” and “actual other,” “itself,” not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self).


--D.G. Leahy, Foundation: Matter the Body Itself

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

PS22 Choir With ANOTHER Monster Recording

Phoenix's Lisztomania. A ray of children's choir on an otherwise gloomy day!

Tyler Perry Is Terrible (and Does Not Know What Type of Movie He Has Just Made)

Why Did I Get Married Too is a horror-thriller where ONE. PERSON. WILL. NOT. MAKE IT:



Why Did I Get Married Too is a romantic comedy set in the Caribbean. It is funny! It is whacky! It is about LIFE. It is a world where The Emotions' "Best of My Love" can play without ironic distance*. It is a world where life lessons are learned while drinking pineappletinis from hollowed out coconuts:



*NB: I couldn't find the TV spot, which is essentially this clip's first 45 seconds of FUN CARIBBEAN HIJINX without the scarier second half. Said TV spot also features The Emotions' "Best of My Love."

Tyle Perry is terrible, this movie looks terrible as a horror-thriller or as a romantic comedy, and it will make enough money for Perry to buy ANOTHER ISLAND. Fair enough. I would probably do the same in Perry's place (I would not do the same in Perry's place).

Monday, March 8, 2010

Add This to My Metaphor01K

On foggy days, the sky and lake fall like a gray curtain, wrinkling at the bottom.

Friday, March 5, 2010

FANFIC TOWN: Will.I.Am's CNN Hologram Gets Invited to the Academy Awards

Will.I.Am's CNN Hologram Gets Invited to the Academy Awards

Will.I.Am's hands were trembling in their futuristic, ribbed gloves with unnecessary glowing wires sticking out of them as he turned over the envelope. He loved opening fan letters! The envelope was made of eggshell paper, heavy, and felt almost leathery to the touch, which is to say it was a very nice envelope! He read the elegant calligraphy on the front:

To: Will.I.Am's CNN Hologram
Hollywood, California

From: The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences

He didn't know what to make of someone named The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences addressing a letter to the hologram he appeared as one time on CNN during the Obama election coverage, but then again, Will.I.Am didn't know what to make of a lot of things: for instance, the one time he appeared as a hologram on CNN during the Obama election coverage. The world was strange and enigmatic, and sometimes people asked you to do strange things like agree to appear on a serious news network during a serious, meaningful election as a Goosebumps Special Hologram Cover-caliber hologram, and you just had to say yes, because? Will.I.Am burped. He forgot about his last thought, but that was OK because he had a feeling that today would be a good, good day, and the envelope he was opening would have good, good things inside it. He was looking forward to being able to say mazel tov to himself.

Will.I.Am opened the envelope, which made a pleasantly crisp sound, like lettuce tearing. He pulled out a piece of paper, unfolded it, and held it up in the early morning Los Angeles light. A watermark appeared in the middle of the paper in the shape of a nude man holding a saber. He said to the watermark, “You look great, man. That sabre is fresh! Where did you get it?” The watermark didn't say anything back, which was strange and a little rude, rude watermark man! Will.I.Am made a mental note to carry around sabers more often.

Thirty minutes later in the driveway Will.I.Am turned from the watermark to start reading the message written over it. Will.I.Am thought this was another mysterious thing that words, strung together, could mean things. Life was hard enough between picking one space gothic outfit over another, and then people expected you to solder words together, like the millions of mechanical parts that made up his favorite Lamborghini MurciƩlago, the one he had fitted with operational gun turrets that shot confetti, a special platform for him and Fergie to stand on and wave at fans when they drove in to a show, and the body molded to look like a lumbering elephant (it was an unusual, nonsensical, and very expensive Lamborghini MurciƩlago, is the point), and then they expected the words to make sense. People in the place!

Will.I.Am had a headache. He took a nap in his bed. His bed was a rocket ship with operational thrusters that fired bubbles. He woke up five hours later and saw the letter on his nightstand, still waiting to be read. Will.I.Am took a poop in the bathroom.

Fergie called Will.I.Am a couple hours later. “Hello, William?”

“This is I am.”

Fergie didn't say anything. They both thought phone calls were hard because they were a lot like talking to someone who wasn't there. Will.I.Am was trying to picture what the person he was talking to, Fergie, looked like, and Fergie was trying to picture what he looked like, and it was all very hard and exhausting, people just never realized how tough it was to be a celebrity. Will.I.Am hung up two silent, thought-filled hours later. What a good phone conversation! Will.I.Am's good, good day had turned into a good, good night.

Will.I.Am noticed the letter sitting on his nightstand. He started reading it:

“The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is pleased to extend an invitation to Will.I.Am to appear, in hologram form, as an Oscar telecast presenter. The Academy producers think this will be a funny, timely, relevant joke, and hope you will think so too...”

Will.I.Am dropped the letter without reading the rest (missing the part that said he would have to attend to film the hologram, and that the addressee on the envelope was just a joke), to the snow leopard rug warming his bare toes. The letter wasn't actually to him! Will.I.Am was very angry. He was very angry that his hologram had gotten an invitation to the Academy Awards over him. And even though he had no special reason to be at the Academy Awards among outsized egos with outsized paychecks, attending lavish parties with foods he couldn't pronounce (words!), handing awards to themselves in what was actually a self-aggrandizing ceremony cementing their relevance, power, and wealth in a world that already recognized them as relevant, powerful, and wealthy, it was still unfair that his hologram would get to go and he would have to stay at home in his mansion shaped like an Islamic crescent moon encircling a giant oasis/pool with waterfalls, three secret grottos, a lazy river, and a dragon water-slide. Even though it was a negative action, and his personal yogi would disapprove, Will.I.Am vowed never to speak to his hologram again. The night was neither good nor bad, but some crepuscular, indeterminate shade between. Will.I.Am got the inside of his yellow space helmet visor wet with his angry, confused tears.

Monday, February 22, 2010

More Snake Oil



Another 'reasoned' and 'factual' argument against gay civil rights. I don't know anything about Ryan Sorba, but I know snake oil when it's rubbed in my face (is what he said). 'Civil rights are grounded in natural rights.' Civil (legal) rights are codified from a culture's attitudes, customs, beliefs, etc., meaning they are particular and not universal. Natural rights refer to universal rights not swayed by culture, locality, belief, etc. Civil and natural rights shouldn't be confused. A polity can violate, oppress, or disregard natural rights if the legal system says it can. We see the enforcement of civil rights today when gay couples are refused marriage contracts and adjudicated as 'separate' (but equal?). And this assumes 'natural rights' even exist, a philosophical debate with deep, gnarled roots, challenged by relativists who find exceptions to the universal all the time (c.f., muslim women who want to wear the burka, when Americans generally find it ideologically offensive/oppressive). So saying, without explication, 'Civil rights are grounded in natural rights' is vague and meaningless.

'Natural rights are grounded in human nature.' If, for the sake of argument, we agree natural rights exist, we then have to make another leap into agreeing on what 'human nature' is, if it IS something at all. We'll just follow Ryan with this one, who claims we are rational by our (human) nature, and thus everything about us follows rationally, including our biology (another leap). 'An intelligible end [to] a reproductive act' is reproduction. By calling the sex act 'reproduction,' Ryan tips his hand. Of course the point of 'reproduction' is reproduction. But the point of sex is a lot more complex, linked to social relationships, community, power, play, and so on. Any primatologist will tell you sex doesn't happen solely to reproduce. And any primatologist will point to homosocial/homoerotic play among primates as proof the 'gay phenomenon' isn't isolated to rational humans. Why would animals engage in irrational, pointless biological behavior? A good theory is that homosexuality serves an important role in same-sex relationships and bonding, and a community with good bonds (and less warring) is likelier to survive and pass on its genes. Ryan mistakes 'rational' for 'apparent.' This is peekaboo logic; just because you can't see something doesn't mean it isn't there.

The most amazing thing about any of this is the time I've spent thinking over it and writing out a response. Ryan Sorbas are dangerous (and persuasive) because they present emotional, prejudiced arguments as reasoned and factual. I'm tired of people dressing up dumb arguments. Enough.

Friday, February 12, 2010